ArticleiScience2026
Neural tracking of prosodic and statistical rhythms jointly supports artificial language learning.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural tracking of prosodic and statistical patterns supports speech segmentation and word learning. Yet, acoustic and abstract patterns have proven difficult to dissociate empirically. Our study employs an artificial language learning paradigm generated with a method that orthogonalizes acoustic and statistical patterns in auditory stimuli. MEG recordings from 32 human adults who had been exposed to continuous syllable streams reveal distinct brain sources tracking periodic acoustic, prosodic, and statistical patterns. After encoding, M200 and M400 field responses to isolated trisyllabic chunks show that participants retained both prosodic and statistical patterns for learning pseudowords from the syllable streams. Behavioral data extend our findings, suggesting not only that integrating both acoustic and abstract patterns is critical to learning, but also that prior knowledge of the pseudowords is sufficient for recognition. The findings advance our understanding of the neural sources that encode and integrate acoustic and statistical patterns during and after language learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.