ReviewiScience2026
Number-action coupling across the lifespan: Sensorimotor foundations of numerical cognition.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Numerosity estimation in children with ADHD across space, time, vision and action.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A growing body of evidence suggests that aspects of numerical cognition interact with action systems, particularly hand motor control, although the strength and nature of this coupling vary across tasks, developmental stages, and cultural contexts. This narrative review synthesizes behavioral, developmental, comparative, and neurophysiological evidence to address four central questions: (1) how early the connection between number and action emerges and how it changes with development; (2) the extent to which education and culture shape number-action coupling; (3) how aging alters these processes and their neural substrates; and (5) what number-action interactions reveal about the broader organization of shared cognitive and sensorimotor mechanisms. Although the evidence remains heterogeneous, as causal demonstrations remain limited and effects are often task-specific, this review nevertheless suggests that number-action mappings are present from infancy, supported by overlapping parietal-frontal networks, and are progressively refined through motor experience. Across childhood, finger gnosis and fine motor skills scaffold numerical development, while cultural practices such as finger-counting shape enduring representational formats. In adulthood, numerical magnitude and action show a robust bidirectional influence, with converging neuroimaging evidence for shared fronto-parietal substrates. In older age, despite executive slowing and motor decline, number-action overlap appears preserved via compensatory recruitment, and embodied interventions show promise. Together, these findings support a layered account in which action systems contribute to scaffold and modulate numerical cognition across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.