ReviewEcancermedicalscience2026
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of breast cancer genetic profiling in Egypt.
Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Precision oncology without borders: the role of biobanking in integrating Africa's genetic diversity into global genomic research.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in Egypt and poses a growing public health challenge with significant socio-economic implications. While traditional diagnostic and treatment approaches remain central to care, advances in genetic testing offer new pathways for early detection, prevention and individualised treatment. Genetic testing, particularly for BRCA1, BRCA2 and other high-penetrance gene mutations, can identify women at elevated risk, enabling proactive surveillance, risk-reducing strategies and tailored therapeutic decisions. This article evaluates the cost-effectiveness of incorporating breast cancer genetic testing into national healthcare protocols. Evidence suggests that genetic screening for high-risk populations can significantly reduce long-term treatment costs by avoiding unnecessary interventions and improving survival through early detection and personalised therapy. In the Egyptian context, the upfront cost of testing can be offset by savings from more targeted chemotherapy, reduced recurrence rates and improved quality of life. The article further discusses the role of personalised medicine in transforming breast cancer care, emphasising the need for national policies that support equitable access to testing. It proposes practical guidelines, including risk-based screening criteria, integration of genetic counseling services, government-subsidised testing programs and capacity-building in local genomic laboratories. By adopting a structured, evidence-based approach to genetic testing and personalised care, Egypt can enhance treatment outcomes, reduce healthcare expenditures and align with global trends in precision oncology. The integration of genetic testing into routine oncology care not only supports clinical decision-making but also represents a strategic investment in the long-term sustainability and efficiency of Egypt's healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.