Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389558›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2026

Low-energy ionizing radiation and carcinogenesis: a call for optimized clinical stewardship in the computed tomography era.

Satyajeet Ratha, Samarth Ozab, Sweta Sonic, Sneha Dhillon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Satyajeet RathaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot 360060, India.
Samarth OzabDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot 360060, India.
Sweta SonicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot 360060, India.
Sneha DhillonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot 360060, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) scans are widely used diagnostics. Despite their diagnostic advantages, their increasing reliance necessitates critical examination of projected lifetime cancer risks due to radiation exposure, a stochastic effect linearly correlated with dose. CT-associated cancers are estimated to increase significantly. The paediatric population is disproportionately vulnerable, facing higher risks even from lower doses. Current risk models may underestimate cancer incidence due to Dose and Dose Rate Effectiveness Factor complexities. High-risk scans such as whole-body CT, abdominal CT and brain CT, significantly increase exposure. A critical re-evaluation of guidelines to prioritise the risk-benefit ratio for CT use. Future diagnostic and screening strategies must prioritize innovation in alternative non-ionizing modalities like magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography and thermography with integration of Artificial Intelligence. 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' principle is essential, aiming to limit ionizing radiation doses to near zero to safeguard public health.

Indexed as

cancer epidemiologycomputed tomographyradiation protection

Identifiers

PMID42389558
PMCPMC13319354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.