Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389474›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

Beyond text: Using network centralities and AI models to detect suicide risk on Reddit.

Golnaz Nikmehr, Aritz Bilbao-Jayo, Aitor Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Golnaz NikmehrDeustotech, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Aritz Bilbao-JayoDeustotech, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Aitor AlmeidaDeustotech, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide prevention research increasingly leverages social media data, where individuals often share personal experiences and emotions. While most studies rely on textual analysis to detect suicidal ideation, the structural characteristics of online social networks remain underexplored. In this exploratory pilot-scale study, we investigate whether network centrality metrics derived from Reddit interaction graphs can provide complementary signals for suicide risk detection beyond text-centric approaches. We construct directed user interaction graphs and extract 14 centrality metrics, including degree, betweenness, eigenvector, authority, and Katz centralities, to evaluate their predictive power. Using traditional machine learning classifiers, we assess the performance of these graph-based features in distinguishing suicidal from non-suicidal users. To further explore the interplay between network structure and textual content, we integrate centrality features with Sentence-BERT (SBERT) embeddings within a Graph Neural Network (GNN) framework. Within the constraints of a small-scale dataset, the best-performing GNN with SBERT achieved 67% accuracy and a 67% F1-score, representing a marginal improvement over the Random Forest baseline (64% accuracy; F1 = 66%). Results show that network centralities alone provide meaningful signals of suicidal risk, revealing patterns of isolation, influence, and social connectedness that characterize vulnerable users. Although these findings provide preliminary evidence for the complementary value of structural network analysis, they should be interpreted cautiously due to dataset scale and keyword-based sampling constraints.

Indexed as

CentralityDeep learningGraph neural networksMachine learningSocial mediaSocial networksSuicidal ideation detection

Identifiers

PMID42389474
PMCPMC13320472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.