Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389460›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Should We Reconstruct Coronal Plane Fractures in Multifragmentary Pertrochanteric Fractures? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Velmurugesan Purnaganapathi Sundaram, Nagashree Vasudeva, Agraharam Devendra, Yoga Bharathi, G S Balachandran, Sivakumar Sp, Jayaramaraju Dheenadhayalan, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Velmurugesan Purnaganapathi SundaramDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, Coimbatore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5713-2616
Nagashree VasudevaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, Coimbatore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8461-0767
Agraharam DevendraDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, Coimbatore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5007-3644
Yoga BharathiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, Coimbatore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9493-839X
G S BalachandranDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, Coimbatore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3700-9896
Sivakumar SpDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, Coimbatore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4087-2316
Jayaramaraju DheenadhayalanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, Coimbatore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1295-136X
Shanmuganathan RajasekaranDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, Coimbatore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-006X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Coronal plane fractures are increasingly identified in multifragmentary pertrochanteric (AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA] 31-A2) fractures, yet their clinical significance is under-researched. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether wire augmentation during Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation Asia (PFNA-II) fixation improves functional outcomes-regain of abductor strength and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS)-compared with PFNA-II alone at 18-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes such as time to union, pain scores (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), and complications were also assessed. Methodology: In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, 142 patients of Asian race and Indian ethnicity aged older than 60 years with AO-OTA 31-A2 fractures were treated using PFNAII, with or without wire augmentation for coronal fragments. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) assessed coronal fragment size. Among them, 116 patients who completed 18-month follow-up were analyzed. Results: Modified intention-to-treat analysis was performed. At 18 months, augmentation produced greater abductor strength (Δ 8.21%, 95% confidence interval, 4.4-12.83; p < 0.001) with no significant difference in mHHS (Δ 3.31 points, -1.3-7.9; p = 0.16). In fragments >50%, wire augmentation led to a clinically relevant 10% strength gain, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 8.2%. However, VAS was similar between groups. Controls showed more varus collapse, likely due to a persisting posteromedial void when the fragment is not stabilized. Conclusion: Wire augmentation improved abductor strength recovery, especially when fragment size exceeded 50%, supporting its use in such cases. However, mHHS were similar between the groups. Level of Evidence: Level I Therapeutic. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID42389460
PMCPMC13322473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.