ArticleJB & JS open access
Prevalence and Implications of Incidental Findings on Computed Tomography Scans Performed for Mako Robotic Arm-Assisted Joint Arthroplasty.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robotic arm-assisted joint arthroplasty has seen an increase in its popularity internationally. Image-based systems, such as the Mako robotic arm-assisted system, require a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan to be performed. These scans may detect incidental findings, which can place additional burden on both patients and healthcare providers. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed to quantify the prevalence and significance of orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic incidental findings on CT scans obtained using the Mako CT protocol. All preoperative CT scans performed using this protocol between December 2018 and December 2024 for patients undergoing elective primary joint arthroplasty at the institution were included. Clinically significant findings were defined as any new and unexpected results which required invasive workup, surgical management, or had a direct negative impact on life expectancy. Results: Of 1,446 CT reports reviewed, 738 (51.0%) contained 1 or more incidental findings. Rates were highest in the total hip arthroplasty (THA) cohort (71.1%), followed by the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty cohort (51.4%) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) cohort (42.7%). Only 4 (0.3%) incidental findings were deemed clinically significant, all within the TKA cohort. These findings led to surgical delay in 2 cases and cancellation in 1 case. Conclusion: Incidental findings are common in preoperative CT scans performed for Mako robotic arm-assisted joint arthroplasty, particularly in THA patients. However, clinically significant findings are rare and infrequently alter surgical time frames. Surgeons should remain aware of the potential ethical and medicolegal implications of these findings. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Diagnostic. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.