ArticleJB & JS open access
Patient-Specific Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Femoral Footprint Mapping Using Compressed Lateral and Sagittal Sequence MRI in Patients With Trochlear Dysplasia.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate identification of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) femoral footprint is essential for successful MPFL reconstruction. Standard tunnel placement techniques, such as the Schöttle method, rely on fixed sagittal radiographic landmarks and may not account for morphological patient variability, particularly in patients with trochlear dysplasia. The Compressed Lateral and Sagittal Sequence (CLASS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method has been validated for assessing the native MPFL insertion and has been used to map its location in normal knees. However, it has not yet been applied to assess anatomical variability in dysplastic knees. The objective of this study was (1) to determine whether the MPFL femoral footprint differs between knees with and without trochlear dysplasia and (2) to assess whether the position of the MPFL footprint in trochlear dysplasia differs from the Schöttle point. Methods: MRI data from 58 dysplastic knees and 80 control knees were analyzed. The femoral MPFL footprint was identified using the CLASS method and projected onto a 2D coordinate system defined by the posterior femoral cortex ( Results: The femoral MPFL footprint in trochlear dysplasia was more anterior (2.05 ± 3.61 mm vs. 0.83 ± 3.39 mm; Conclusion: Trochlear dysplasia alters the femoral MPFL footprint, producing a significant systematic distal displacement compared with both normal knees and the Schöttle point, with a mean distal difference of 3.28 mm vs. normal knees and 4.84 mm relative to Schöttle point, emphasizing the anatomical variability overlooked by standardized landmarks. This supports the use of the CLASS algorithm for individualized tunnel placement in MPFL reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Level IV, diagnostic. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.