Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389412›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular echography

Point-of-care Cardiac Ultrasound in Coronavirus Disease 2019: Indications and Potentials.

Rim J El-Annan, Dalia Safi, Mariam Arabi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular echography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rim J El-AnnanFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Dalia SafiFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mariam ArabiDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) strained health systems worldwide and underscored the need for rapid, safe, and efficient bedside imaging. This narrative review synthesizes forty studies, largely from the United States and Europe, on the role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the care of patients with COVID-19, with emphasis on cardiology. Compared with full transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography, POCUS is faster, less costly, and free of ionizing radiation. Several reports document a reduction in staff exposure time by up to seventy-one percent, lowering infection risk and conserving personal protective equipment. In critically ill patients, POCUS frequently identifies right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary abnormalities, including vertical reverberation artifacts and subpleural consolidations, which support timely clinical decisions; some series observed management changes in as many as seventy percent of cases. Limitations include operator dependence, variable image quality, and a restricted field of view that can necessitate complementary imaging. Overall, POCUS shows strong promise as an integral element of COVID-19 pathways and routine cardiovascular care. Broader training, competency assessment, and standardized protocols are needed to ensure consistent, high-quality implementation at the bedside.

Indexed as

Cardiac assessmentcoronavirus disease 2019healthcare exposurepoint-of-care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42389412
PMCPMC13322589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.