Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389390›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Sexual functioning in trichotillomania and skin picking disorder.

Megha Neelapu, Jon E Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Megha NeelapuDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Jon E GrantDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study examines sexual functioning in adults with trichotillomania and skin picking disorder. To our knowledge, no study has examined sexual functioning in either of these disorders. Methods: 334 adults (mean age=30.21, SD = 8.23, 83.5% cisgender women, 67.6% sexually active with another person in the past month) were recruited from online Reddit communities. Participants completed surveys assessing demographics, sexual functioning, and current and lifetime pulling and picking severity. Comorbidities and treatment history were assessed via dichotomous variables. Sexual functioning was assessed via the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire - Short Form (CSFQ-14). Results: 27.1% (n=85) of the sample met criteria for sexual dysfunction. After controlling for relationship status, participants who rated their picking as currently at its worst had significantly lower scores on the Orgasm/Completion subscale. Sexual dysfunction, the total score, and subscales scores were not significantly associated with any current comorbidities or treatment variables. Conclusions: It is difficult to compare rate of sexual dysfunction in adults with trichotillomania and skin picking disorder with the rate in the general population given the homogeneity of this study's sample. However, worse skin picking symptoms appear to be associated with worse sexual functioning, particularly in the orgasm domain. Since severity of comorbidities was not assessed in this study, further research is needed to determine whether comorbid disorders have an effect on sexual functioning in this population.

Indexed as

body-focused repetitive behaviorssexual dysfunctionsexual functioningskin picking disordertrichotillomania

Identifiers

PMID42389390
PMCPMC13318934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.