ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
T1 rhizotomy for post-stroke hand flexion spasticity: a preliminary report of 15 cases.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Stroke is the leading cause of central upper limb spastic paralysis, with hand flexion spasticity being the most common and functionally debilitating manifestation. Various surgical approaches have been explored, yet optimal management remains challenging. This study proposes T1 rhizotomy as a novel surgical intervention for post-stroke hand flexion spasticity. Methods: Fifteen consecutive patients with unilateral post-stroke hand flexion spasticity underwent T1 rhizotomy between November 2023 and December 2024. Under general anesthesia, the T1 nerve root was exposed via a supraclavicular approach, transected distally, and a 1 cm proximal segment was resected. Safety and complications were recorded. Patients were followed for at least one year. Spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and hand function using the modified House Functional Classification (HFC). Functional and ADL outcomes were assessed using the QuickDASH questionnaire and the Barthel Index. Results: All procedures were completed successfully without intraoperative complications or major adverse events. Transient postoperative numbness or mild forearm pain occurred in some patients and resolved within three months. At final follow-up, mean MAS score decreased from 3.07 ± 0.59 preoperatively to 1.20 ± 0.86, and mean HFC grade improved from 1.07 ± 0.26 to 2.73 ± 0.88. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed significant improvements (MAS: Conclusions: T1 rhizotomy appears safe and effective for post-stroke hand flexion spasticity, significantly reducing spasticity and improving hand function. Further studies with extended follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.