ArticleSurgery open science2026
Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted liver surgery: A comparison between patients with and without previous abdominal surgery.
Article in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robotic-assisted liver surgery (RALSs) has numerous advantages over laparoscopic and open procedures. However, prior abdominal surgeries (PAS) are frequently considered as constraints for RALSs. Our study evaluated the impact of PAS on the intraoperative course and postoperative outcomes after RALSs. Materials and methods: For this retrospective cohort study, clinicopathological data were collected from all patients who underwent RALSs at the University Hospital Münster between December 2018 and March 2024. Patients were stratified based on whether they had undergone PAS or not (NPAS), the intraoperative course and postoperative outcomes after RALSs were analyzed. Results: In total, 116 patients were identified, 79 patients had undergone PAS, and 37 patients had not. The mean surgery time, conversion rate, intraoperative complications, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and length of hospital stay (LOS) were comparable between the two groups. Forty-three patients had postoperative complications, without significant difference (PAS: 34 patients, NPAS: 9 patients). No deaths were observed within 30 days of surgery. One PAS patient died within 90 days of surgery. Discussion: Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing RALSs were comparable in between PAS and NPAS patients and PAS was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. PAS alone should not be considered as contraindication for RALSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.