Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389333›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters

Interpretable Model for Clinical Use in Left Atrial Appendage Segmentation via an Optimised Deformable-Attention U-Net With Spatial-Channel Fusion.

Ali Pakizeh Moghadam, Javad Haddadnia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali Pakizeh MoghadamDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering Hakim Sabzevari University Sabzevar Iran.
Javad HaddadniaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering Hakim Sabzevari University Sabzevar Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9332-3114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is essential for device occlusion planning in atrial fibrillation patients who cannot receive anticoagulation. Yet 3D echocardiography suffers from low signal-to-noise ratio, anisotropy and marked morphological variability, increasing overfitting risk and reliance on operator-dependent post-processing. Existing U-Net variants capture local detail but often miss long-range dependencies, while transformers improve context at the cost of boundary precision; semi-automated pipelines still require experts. We present a fully automated, AERO-optimised DAT-DAD U-Net with SE-augmented skip fusion. Deformable attention transformers (DAT) provide content-adaptive global context, while a dual attention with deformable convolution (DAD) block refines rims and addresses shape irregularities; spatial-channel squeeze-and-excitation improves multi-scale fusion. Hyperparameters are selected by AERO, a surrogate- and multi-fidelity-driven optimiser balancing exploration and exploitation under limited data in practice. Validation used a 22-patient 3D echocardiography cohort from King's College Hospital. Volumes were reformatted into axial 2D slices, trained with on-the-fly anatomy-preserving augmentation and evaluated using strict patient-wise splits. The model achieved Dice 0.8925 ± 0.0144, IoU 0.8026 ± 0.0156 and HD95 9.14 ± 1.96 mm. Ablations confirmed additive gains from DAT, DAD and SE, with faster convergence and a lower error floor, supporting operator-light, time-sensitive LAA workflows.

Indexed as

bidirectional attention blocksdeep learningdeformable attention U‐Netechocardiography imageshyperparameter optimisationLAA segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42389333
PMCPMC13319416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.