ArticleFrontiers in transplantation2026
Echocardiography-guided assessment of mouse cardiac transplant rejection improves model reproducibility.
Article in Frontiers in transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The mouse heterotopic heart transplant model is a widely used system for dissecting mechanisms of graft rejection and identifying new therapeutic targets, owing to its relative technical simplicity and the availability of well-defined inbred strains. One limitation of the model is that monitoring of the non-life sustaining implanted graft by manual palpation does not provide information regarding the magnitude of the anti-donor immune response and is operator-dependent. Building on previous studies suggesting that trans-abdominal ultrasonography can detect graft rejection more precisely than manual palpation, we tested if changes in motion mode (M-mode) ultrasound also correlated with the magnitude of the anti-donor T cell response. Methods: We performed sets of MHC-mismatched heterotopic heart transplants in mice and quantified the accuracy of palpation vs. ultrasonography in determining graft rejection. In an additional set of mice, we performed mixed lymphocyte reactions to quantify anti-donor T cell immunity at a fixed time point (usual experimental design) or at time points determined by changes in allograft M-mode analysis. Conclusions: The data demonstrate that ultrasonography is superior to manual palpation for determining graft rejection and newly shows that changes in M-mode associate with the magnitude of anti-donor T cell immunity. These findings are important to increase reproducibility and translational impact of studies using this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.