ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Managing lumbar adjacent segment disease: A description of minimally invasive techniques and algorithm.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To manage symptomatic lumbar adjacent segment disease effectively using minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) techniques. Methods: This study presents a tailored, step-by-step guide for managing lumbar adjacent segment disease (ASD) using MIS-TLIF techniques in patients with prior spinal fusion surgeries, whether open or minimally invasive. Four distinct surgical approaches are outlined, each selected based on the time elapsed since the primary surgery, the level of ASD involvement, and the fusion status of the previously operated segment. The study includes patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar ASD between January 2008 and December 2023. Results: A total of 23 cases were surgically treated using four different techniques. The study age group was from 40 to 80 years (Mean age: 68.5 years). None of them had to be converted to open surgery. Patients operated using the described techniques reported significant clinical improvements, with the mean Oswestry Disability Index decreasing from 58.47 ± 6.07 to 22.58 ± 3.299 and the Visual Analog Scale scores improving from 7.076 ± 1.04 to 1.9 ± 0.77 of the preoperative symptoms. Conclusion: Drawing on their extensive clinical experience, the authors provide valuable insights into the management of lumbar ASD using an algorithmic approach based entirely on posterior minimally invasive surgical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.