Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389308›Full record

ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

Morphometric analysis of lumbar nerve root takeoff in the lumbar spine.

Andy Hu, Robert Jackson Ferdon, Chase Walton, Warren Roth, Michal Williams, Jason Silvestre, Reed Butler, Jamie Wilson, Robert A Ravinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andy HuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Robert Jackson FerdonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Chase WaltonDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Warren RothDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Michal WilliamsDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Jason SilvestreDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Reed ButlerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Jamie WilsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Robert A RavinskyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to quantify lumbar nerve root takeoff height and assess its clinical relevance in patients with lumbar spine pathology. Overview of Literature: Although lateral recess and foraminal stenosis are known causes of radiculopathy, the vertical origin (takeoff height) of lumbar nerve roots has not been quantitatively assessed. A higher nerve root origin from the thecal sac, or root takeoff, may be of clinical relevance, as a more proximal takeoff will consequently result in a greater length of neural tissue traversing the lateral recess. This study aims to characterize variability in lumbar nerve root takeoff height using computed tomography (CT) myelography in patients with lumbar spinal pathology. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of CT myelograms from patients with lumbar pathology with measurements of the vertical origin (root takeoff height) of L4 and L5 nerve roots relative to total interpedicular height, producing a takeoff ratio (h/H). Clinical records were reviewed to categorize symptom distribution as leg-dominant, back-dominant, or mixed. Statistical analyses included interrater reliability (κ), intrarater reliability, group comparisons, correlation testing between takeoff ratio and symptom type, and a priori power analysis. Results: A total of 75 patients were included in the study. Nerve root takeoff height showed substantial interindividual variability at both L3-4 and L4-5 levels. Conclusion: Lumbar nerve root takeoff height demonstrates meaningful variability across patients, representing an anatomical parameter not typically considered in conventional imaging assessments. In this study, we observed that such variability may influence how nerve roots traverse the lateral recess. We speculate that a higher root takeoff could predispose patients to radicular symptoms; however, further investigation is needed to confirm this relationship.

Indexed as

Intervertebral disc degenerationlow back painmyelographyradiculopathyspinal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID42389308
PMCPMC13322730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.