Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389298›Full record

ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

Analysis of baseline sagittal balance indicators and compensatory mechanisms at adult degenerative scoliosis in elderly patients operated on minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Vladimir S Klimov, Juri V Kivelev, Evgeniya V Amelina, Alexey V Evsukov, Alexei L Krivoshapkin, Sergei O Ryabykh, Andrei A Kalinin, Vadim A Byvaltsev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vladimir S KlimovDepartment of Neurosurgery, European Medical Center, Moscow, Russia.
Juri V KivelevDepartment of Neurosurgery, European Medical Center, Moscow, Russia.
Evgeniya V AmelinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexey V EvsukovDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Ilizarov Medical Research Center For Traumatology and Orthopedics, Kurgan, Russia.
Alexei L KrivoshapkinDepartment of Neurosurgery, European Medical Center, Moscow, Russia.
Sergei O RyabykhDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Andrei A KalininDepartment of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
Vadim A ByvaltsevDepartment of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective single-center study. Background: Spinal alignment is crucial for maintaining upright posture, neural protection, and skeletal stability. Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) is complex due to variability in clinical presentations and radiological parameters. Restoration of sagittal and coronal balance through minimally invasive techniques, including minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MI-LLIF), especially in elderly patients has demonstrated efficacy in reducing pain and enhancing quality of life. Purpose: To evaluate the baseline sagittal alignment and compensatory mechanisms in elderly ADS patients operated on MI-LLIF, emphasizing the predictive value of key radiological parameters. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective review of 51 elderly patients with lumbar degenerative scoliosis treated using MI-LLIF. Radiological parameters evaluated were the coronal Cobb angle (CCA), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope, pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL mismatch, L4-S1 lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, spino-sacral angle (SSA), and the Index Barrey (IB). Radiological assessment with X-ray was used before operation and mean 2.7 years follow-up. Results: Preoperative CCA was 15° (11;20). The average PT was 21.9°, what confirmed the presence of sagittal imbalance in 98% of elderly patients with ADS. In accordance with IB, 18 (35%) patients were identified as balanced due to compensation mechanisms (IB <0.5). Global sagittal imbalance (IB >0.5) was revealed in 33 (65%) patients. The main reason of sagittal imbalance was L4-S1 lordosis insufficiency (80%). The main compensation mechanisms were retroversion of the pelvis (98%), hypokyphosis (67%), and hyperextension at the L4-S1 level (14%). Conclusions: All patients have spinopelvic malalignment according to IB, and the main reason for its development was deficiency of L4-S1 and LL. The most sensitive markers of sagittal imbalance were PT with the calculation of target individual values, IB and SSA. The main compensatory mechanisms of sagittal imbalance are retroversion of the pelvis, thoracic hypokyphosis, and hyperextension in the overlying segments.

Indexed as

Adult degenerative scoliosiselderly patientsgeriatric orthopedic surgeryminimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusionminimally invasive surgerysagittal imbalance

Identifiers

PMID42389298
PMCPMC13322732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.