ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Proliferative myositis of the biceps brachii: A sarcoma mimicker.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proliferative myositis is a rare benign intramuscular inflammatory pseudotumor that may clinically mimic a soft tissue sarcoma due to its rapid growth and painful presentation. We report the case of a 50-year-old man presenting with a rapidly enlarging, firm, and painful mass of the left arm, which had appeared 3 weeks earlier, without any history of trauma or systemic symptoms. Ultrasound demonstrated an oblong intramuscular pseudomass within the biceps brachii muscle, with preserved fibrillar architecture and mild Doppler vascularity. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lesion involving the biceps brachii and coracobrachialis muscles, appearing hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on STIR sequences, with homogeneous enhancement after gadolinium administration and associated subcutaneous edema. The preservation of muscle fascicles within the lesion resulted in a characteristic fibrillar pattern. A follow-up ultrasound performed 1 month later showed complete resolution. In this clinical and imaging context, proliferative myositis should be considered as a leading diagnostic hypothesis. Although the absence of histopathologic confirmation represents a limitation in our case, the characteristic imaging features combined with complete spontaneous resolution strongly support this diagnosis and make a malignant process such as sarcoma highly unlikely. Recognition of this presentation is essential to guide appropriate management and potentially avoid unnecessary biopsy in selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.