ArticleArXiv2026
Optimization in Sparse 2D to Dense 3D Weakly Supervised Learning: Application to Multi-Label Segmentation of Large ex vivo MRI Data.
Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION —: The fully supervised segmentation of 3D medical images featuring large amounts of slices (1,000+), such as serial block-face electron microscopy, or high-resolution ex vivo MRI, imposes prohibitive cost of volumetric manual annotation. Oftentimes, researchers resort to limited ground truth annotations consisting of sparse 2D slices, forcing a reliance on models that lack volumetric context. Incorporating across-slice information in the model can be done using a weakly supervised Sparse-to-Dense framework. However, guidelines for training such models remain ambiguous, specifically regarding the alignment between human-centric visual enhancements and machine perception, and the transferability of optimization strategies from 2D to 3D contexts. Here, we propose an analysis of divergent regularization needs in the context of multi-class segmentation of high-resolution ex vivo spinal cord MRI. METHODS —: Data consists of 9.4T MRI of ex vivo spinal cord volumes with sparse manual annotations (428 annotated slices). Samples were obtained from pathologically confirmed cases of Multiple Sclerosis, totaling 104,000+ slices. A 2D Teacher network was trained on those sparse annotations to generate dense volumetric pseudo-labels, which were subsequently used to train a 3D Student network. We conducted a systematic optimization of this pipeline, analyzing the impact of image preprocessing (to evaluate human-centric image contrast enhancement), spatial augmentation (to mitigate positional shortcut learning), and soft-label regularization (to model lesion boundary uncertainty) on both 2D and 3D architectures. RESULTS —: Our analysis reveals a critical divergence in training dynamics between dimensions that challenges standard low-data training assumptions. While the 2D Teacher significantly benefited from strong spatial augmentation and soft-labeling regularization - improving White Matter Lesion detection by over 11 Dice Score percentage points - these same techniques failed to improve or even degraded the performance of the 3D Student. Additionally, preprocessing techniques designed to enhance visual contrast for human raters (such as CLAHE) caused a performance drop, degrading Gray Matter Lesion Dice Scores by nearly 25 percentage points by disrupting global statistical cues. DISCUSSION —: This study sheds light on a perception divergence: preprocessing methods designed to aid human raters (image contrast enhancement) proved destructive to machine learning models by distorting global intensity statistics. Moreover, this study reveals a regularization conflict across dimensions in sparse-to-dense learning. While aggressive spatial augmentation and soft-labeling were helpful for the 2D Teacher to overcome sparse data scarcity, propagating these distinct techniques to the 3D Student resulted in performance degradation. These findings suggest that 3D architectures, when trained on dense pseudo-labels, exhibit fundamentally different optimization landscapes than their 2D counterparts and require a distinct, conservative regularization strategy. Code and model are available at https://github.com/ivadomed/model_seg_sc-gm-lesion_human_ms_exvivo_t2star.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42389252PMC13317652What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.