Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389252›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Optimization in Sparse 2D to Dense 3D Weakly Supervised Learning: Application to Multi-Label Segmentation of Large ex vivo MRI Data.

Paul Hoareau, Kuan Yi Wang, Brandon Bujak, Roy Sun, Govind Nair, Irene Cortese, Charidimos Tsagkas, Daniel Reich, Julien Cohen-Adad

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul HoareauNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kuan Yi WangNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Brandon BujakQuantitative MRI core facility, NINDS, NIH.
Roy SunQuantitative MRI core facility, NINDS, NIH.
Govind NairQuantitative MRI core facility, NINDS, NIH.
Irene CorteseNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Charidimos TsagkasTranslational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Bethesda, MD 20893, USA.
Daniel ReichNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Julien Cohen-AdadNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION —: The fully supervised segmentation of 3D medical images featuring large amounts of slices (1,000+), such as serial block-face electron microscopy, or high-resolution ex vivo MRI, imposes prohibitive cost of volumetric manual annotation. Oftentimes, researchers resort to limited ground truth annotations consisting of sparse 2D slices, forcing a reliance on models that lack volumetric context. Incorporating across-slice information in the model can be done using a weakly supervised Sparse-to-Dense framework. However, guidelines for training such models remain ambiguous, specifically regarding the alignment between human-centric visual enhancements and machine perception, and the transferability of optimization strategies from 2D to 3D contexts. Here, we propose an analysis of divergent regularization needs in the context of multi-class segmentation of high-resolution ex vivo spinal cord MRI. METHODS —: Data consists of 9.4T MRI of ex vivo spinal cord volumes with sparse manual annotations (428 annotated slices). Samples were obtained from pathologically confirmed cases of Multiple Sclerosis, totaling 104,000+ slices. A 2D Teacher network was trained on those sparse annotations to generate dense volumetric pseudo-labels, which were subsequently used to train a 3D Student network. We conducted a systematic optimization of this pipeline, analyzing the impact of image preprocessing (to evaluate human-centric image contrast enhancement), spatial augmentation (to mitigate positional shortcut learning), and soft-label regularization (to model lesion boundary uncertainty) on both 2D and 3D architectures. RESULTS —: Our analysis reveals a critical divergence in training dynamics between dimensions that challenges standard low-data training assumptions. While the 2D Teacher significantly benefited from strong spatial augmentation and soft-labeling regularization - improving White Matter Lesion detection by over 11 Dice Score percentage points - these same techniques failed to improve or even degraded the performance of the 3D Student. Additionally, preprocessing techniques designed to enhance visual contrast for human raters (such as CLAHE) caused a performance drop, degrading Gray Matter Lesion Dice Scores by nearly 25 percentage points by disrupting global statistical cues. DISCUSSION —: This study sheds light on a perception divergence: preprocessing methods designed to aid human raters (image contrast enhancement) proved destructive to machine learning models by distorting global intensity statistics. Moreover, this study reveals a regularization conflict across dimensions in sparse-to-dense learning. While aggressive spatial augmentation and soft-labeling were helpful for the 2D Teacher to overcome sparse data scarcity, propagating these distinct techniques to the 3D Student resulted in performance degradation. These findings suggest that 3D architectures, when trained on dense pseudo-labels, exhibit fundamentally different optimization landscapes than their 2D counterparts and require a distinct, conservative regularization strategy. Code and model are available at https://github.com/ivadomed/model_seg_sc-gm-lesion_human_ms_exvivo_t2star.

Indexed as

High ResolutionMRIMultiple SclerosisSegmentationSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID42389252
PMCPMC13317652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.