Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389250›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Characterizing Universal Object Representations Across Vision Models.

Florian P Mahner, Johannes Roth, Ka Chun Lam, Michael F Bonner, Francisco Pereira, Martin N Hebart

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Florian P MahnerVision and Computational Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen.
Johannes RothVision and Computational Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen.
Ka Chun LamMachine Learning Core, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Michael F BonnerDepartment of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Francisco PereiraMachine Learning Core, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Martin N HebartVision and Computational Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen.

Funding

Machine Learning TeamZICMH002968 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PEREIRA, FRANCISCO · 2018 to 2025
$13.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC MH002968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks trained with different architectures, objectives, and datasets have been reported to converge on similar visual representations. However, what remains unknown is which visual properties models actually converge on and which factors may underlie this convergence. To address this, we decompose the object similarity structure of 162 diverse vision models into a small set of non-negative dimensions. To determine universal versus model-specific dimensions, we then estimate how often each dimension reappears across models. In contrast to model-specific dimensions, universal dimensions are more interpretable and more strongly driven by conceptual image properties, indicating the relevance of interpretability and semantic content as implicit factors driving universality across models. Differences in architecture, objective function, training data, model size, and model performance do not explain the emergence of universal dimensions. However, models with more universal dimensions also better predict macaque IT activity and human similarity judgments, suggesting that universality reflects representations relevant to biological vision. These findings have important implications for understanding the emergent representations underlying deep neural network models and their alignment with biological vision.

Identifiers

PMID42389250
PMCPMC13317642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.