Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389229›Full record

ReviewClinical neurophysiology practice2026

Neuromuscular ultrasound of the brachial plexus: know-how, know-when.

Eman A Tawfik, Erisela Qerama, Antonios Kerasnoudis, Nens van Alfen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eman A TawfikDepartment of Rheumatology, Rehabilitation, and Physical Medicine, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.
Erisela QeramaDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Antonios KerasnoudisDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany.
Nens van AlfenDepartment of Neurology& Clinical Neurophysiology, Clinical Neuromuscular Imaging Group, Donders Center for Neuroscience, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromuscular ultrasound has become an integral diagnostic tool for brachial plexopathies, complementing electrodiagnostic studies and MRI. Despite the complex anatomy of the brachial plexus, nearly its entire postganglionic course is accessible by ultrasound, providing real-time, high-resolution structural information at the bedside. Characteristic sonographic findings have been described in traumatic plexopathies, neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome, neuralgic amyotrophy, immune-mediated polyneuropathies, and neoplastic plexopathies. Evidence of moderate-to-high certainty now supports the use of ultrasound as a diagnostic adjunct in these conditions. Integration into clinical practice requires thorough knowledge of plexus anatomy and sonoanatomy, appropriate scanning techniques, and familiarity with condition-specific sonographic patterns. This review provides a practical framework for brachial plexus ultrasound, covering applied anatomy, systematic scanning approach, sonographic parameters and their interpretation, condition-specific findings, scanning protocols, and an evidence-based summary of its current indications.

Indexed as

Brachial plexopathiesBrachial plexusBrachial plexus ultrasoundNerve sonographyNerve ultrasoundNeuromuscular ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42389229
PMCPMC13320397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.