ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026
Automatic framework for PD-L1 expression evaluation in Latino patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is a key biomarker for identifying non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients eligible for immunotherapy, but its immunohistochemistry assessment is subject to high interobserver variability. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated system based on artificial intelligence (AI) to detect and classify PD-L1-positive cells in digital lung biopsies from Latin American patients with NSCLC. A total of 141 biopsies were digitized, and deep learning models were trained for tissue segmentation and analysis. YOLOv8 was used for cell detection and ResNet50 for classification into four categories (tumor or non-tumor cells, PD-L1 positive or negative). The tumor proportion score (TPS) was calculated using these classifications. The YOLOv8 model achieved 76% precision and a mAP@0.5 of 63.7% in cell detection, whereas ResNet50 reached 85.2% sensitivity in identifying PD-L1-positive tumor cells. The TPS estimated by the system demonstrated 97% concordance with manual evaluation by an expert pathologist. In addition, spatial PD-L1 maps revealed intratumoral heterogeneity, supporting its relevance for immunotherapy decisions. These findings show that automated PD-L1 quantification using AI is feasible and accurate, improves diagnostic reproducibility, and supports personalized treatment decisions, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.