ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Classification of "Athlete's Heart" using machine learning of conventional 12-lead ECG: male elite 3,000-m runner data in the CHIEF study.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Conventional electrocardiographic (ECG) interpretive algorithms often struggle to distinguish physiological cardiovascular adaptations in athletes from cardiac pathology. This study utilized machine learning (ML) to estimate the likelihood of elite 3,000-meter running performance using resting ECG and biological markers within a large military cohort. Methods: We analyzed data from 2,296 physically active military males in the Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Health in Eastern Armed Forces (CHIEF) Heart Study. Three ML classifiers-logistic regression (LR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and support vector machine (SVM)-were trained using 26 ECG features (axis, duration and voltage of P, QRS and T waves in each lead and supine heart rate) and 6 biological features (age, body weight, body height, waist circumference, blood pressure and sitting pulse rate) to classify "elite" runners (defined as the top 5% and 10% performance groups). The whole data were randomly grouped by a 3:1 ratio into a training/validation set ( Results: For the top 10% runners, LR demonstrated the highest discriminative power (AUC: 80.81%), followed by MLP (78.43%). In the top 5% group, MLP performed best with an AUC of 74.42%. When specificity was fixed at approximately 60%-70%, the sensitivity of the optimal models for both groups exceeded 81%. Conclusions: ML can effectively classify elite endurance capacity using non-invasive resting ECG markers. These findings highlight the potential for updating automated ECG interpretive algorithms to better recognize "athlete's heart." Furthermore, this approach may serve as a cost-effective preliminary screening tool for identifying elite athletic potential, although further validation in female and more diverse populations is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.