ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Dynamic relationships among first-year university students' critical thinking, academic self-concept, and student engagement: a cross-lagged study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical thinking and academic self-concept are key predictors of student engagement among first-year university students. Yet, the mechanisms underlying their relationships remain unclear. This one-year longitudinal study examined cross-lagged relationships between critical thinking and academic self-concept and their effects on student engagement. A sample of 3,437 Chinese first-year university students completed measures at two waves; data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). Four main findings emerged. First, critical thinking and academic self-concept showed significant cross-lagged effects: critical thinking negatively predicted academic self-concept, whereas academic self-concept positively predicted critical thinking. Second, critical thinking positively predicted T2 student engagement. Third, academic self-concept negatively predicted T2 student engagement. Fourth, these dynamic relationships were consistent across Math and English disciplines. The findings extend the literature on student engagement and offer insights into its development during the transition to university.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.