Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389107›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A psychological network analysis of parental and peer support on children's football participation: the bridging role of self-efficacy.

Xiancheng Zeng, Wei He, Zhigang Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiancheng ZengFootball School, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei HeSchool of Sport and Health, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhigang GuoFootball School, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Guided by ecological systems theory, this study employs psychological network analysis to investigate how parental and peer support interact with children's football participation and whether these ecological dynamics differ by gender. Methods: We estimated regularized partial correlation networks using EBICglasso on a sample of 287 primary school students ( Results: Self-efficacy emerged as the most central node and the primary bridge connecting social support to football participation. The global network structure did not differ significantly between boys and girls, suggesting a largely similar psychological architecture across genders. Descriptive patterns suggested that internal persistence items were more central for boys, whereas participation and relational support items were more central for girls. Discussion: These findings suggest a possible integration of social cognitive and ecological systems perspectives within a network framework. They offer tentative insights that could be considered when developing broadly applicable or gender-responsive interventions to support children's sustained football participation.

Indexed as

football participationgender differenceparental supportpeer supportself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID42389107
PMCPMC13319038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.