ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Acute psychological responses to formal and small-sided volleyball games in male youth athletes: an exploratory repeated-measures study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Small-sided games are frequently used in youth sport training, yet their acute psychological effects in volleyball remain insufficiently described. This study examined whether formal games (6 vs. 6) and small-sided games (3 vs. 3) were associated with distinct short-term responses in anxiety, mood, affective valence, enjoyment, perceived recovery, and perceived exertion among male youth volleyball athletes. Methods: Thirty male athletes aged 14-18 years completed repeated training sessions under two game formats during the pre-competitive period. Psychological and perceptual measures were obtained before and/or after each session, depending on the outcome assessed. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to examine condition, moment, and condition × moment effects. Given the sample size, the nonrandomized repeated-measures design, and the fixed sequence of conditions, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory, as condition effects cannot be fully separated from order and time-related influences. Results: State anxiety increased from pre- to post-session, irrespective of game format. Among the mood-related outcomes, only tension demonstrated a statistically robust condition × moment interaction after false discovery rate correction, with less favorable post-session responses in the 3 vs. 3 format. Depression, fatigue, and confusion increased, and vigor decreased from pre- to post-session regardless of condition. Affective valence, perceived recovery, and perceived exertion did not differ between formats. Although anger and enjoyment showed condition-related differences in the unadjusted analyses, these findings did not remain statistically robust after correction for multiple comparisons. Discussion: In this exploratory sample of male youth volleyball athletes, formal and small-sided games produced broadly similar acute psychological responses across most outcomes. The most robust condition-related finding was higher post-session tension in the small-sided format, whereas the unadjusted findings for anger and enjoyment should be interpreted with caution, as they did not remain statistically robust after false discovery rate correction. These findings suggest that different game formats may be associated with specific short-term emotional experiences during training, but larger, better-controlled studies are needed before drawing definitive conclusions about their implications for mental health-related outcomes in youth sport.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.