ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Identifying foreign language learning burnout: latent profiles, cutoff points, and an explainable web-based calculator.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Foreign language learning burnout (FLLB) is prevalent among English as a foreign language learners, which adversely affects students' academic performance and mental health. However, the clear cutoff point and individualized risk prediction tools for FLLB remain lacking, limiting its application in practical identification and assessment. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 1,343 Chinese secondary school students and collected data on FLLB, academic stress, engagement, teacher affective support, foreign language enjoyment, English achievement, and demographic characteristics. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify FLLB risk profiles. The cutoff point was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Six machine learning models were compared, and their generalizability was evaluated in an external validation set. The best-performing model was selected, interpreted with Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) analysis, and deployed as a web-based calculator. Results: LPA indicated that 14.2% of students belonged to the FLLB high-risk group. The optimal cutoff point was determined as: Exhaustion ≥14, Cynicism ≥3, and Reduced Efficacy ≥3. Logistic regression performed best, with AUC values of 0.903 (internal test set) and 0.813 (external validation set). SHAP analysis revealed that academic stress and foreign language enjoyment were key predictors. Conclusion: This study determined an operational cutoff point for FLLB. A well-performing risk prediction model was then developed and validated, which we subsequently deployed as a web-based calculator. The tool reports FLLB risk probabilities and visualizes the direction and relative contribution of key predictors, thereby providing a reference for efficient FLLB risk screening and subsequent targeted learning support and psycho-educational services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.