ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Developing a cognitive model of advanced teacher professional vision for understanding processes of noticing and reasoning.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teacher professional vision (PV) describes teachers' situation-specific ability to notice and reason about pedagogically relevant classroom events - encompassing both instructional learning processes and classroom management interactions. PV comprises two core processes: noticing (the selective perception of relevant classroom cues) and reasoning/interpretation (the knowledge-based process of making sense of what has been noticed). Previous research has consistently shown that novice and expert teachers differ systematically in their PV skills and that these skills can be fostered through targeted professional development. While existing models of professional vision have provided important conceptual distinctions between noticing and reasoning, a theory-based specification of the underlying cognitive processes remains limited. In this conceptual contribution, we address this gap by introducing a cognitive processing model of teacher professional vision (PV-CP model) that aligns PV research with central assumptions from educational cognitive psychology and expertise research. The model differentiates four core processes: two noticing-related processes (information selection and breadth of the visual field) and two reasoning-related processes (cognitive organizing and integrating). Drawing on recent empirical studies of PV, predominantly using eye-tracking methods, we synthesize systematic differences between novice and experienced teachers across these processes. Experienced teachers are characterized by rapid, knowledge-guided information selection, holistic classroom monitoring, and the ability to organize and integrate visual information into coherent mental models, enabling accurate interpretation and adaptive decision-making. Building on the PV-CP model, we further discuss implications for the design of professional vision training in teacher education. In particular, we discuss video-based learning environments, eye movement modeling examples, and verbal expert self-explanations and outline how these approaches may support targeted development of noticing and reasoning processes. By providing a cognitively grounded process model, this contribution advances theoretical integration in PV research and offers a systematic framework for future empirical studies and instructional interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.