ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Discontinuing Anti-VEGF Therapy in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration That Remains Inactive with Treatment at the Maximum Injection Interval.
Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to provide guidance on the management of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) whose disease becomes inactive on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. The Vision Academy's membership of international retinal disease experts reviewed the literature and developed consensus recommendations and an algorithm to determine the appropriate timing of treatment suspension and a post-treatment follow-up strategy for appropriate patients with nAMD who achieve a good response to anti-VEGF therapy. Patients with inactive disease (defined as absence of both intraretinal and subretinal fluid, absence of deterioration in vision, and absence of new retinal hemorrhage) for at least three consecutive maximum treatment intervals as outlined in the clinic's protocol may be considered for treatment exit. However, in patients with stable disease that remains active and those with only one good seeing eye and a history of disease recurrence, treatment continuation may be preferred. An appropriate interval for continued monitoring with optical coherence tomography and visual acuity testing should be decided following discussion with the patient and consideration of patient-specific factors. This article presents consensus guidelines for nAMD management in patients who respond well to anti-VEGF therapy, and for the discontinuation of treatment in cases of success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.