Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389062›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology research and practice2026

The Effect of Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block With Dexmedetomidine as an Additive Versus Intrathecal Morphine on Early Mobilization After Total Hip Replacement Under Spinal Anesthesia in Cairo University Hospitals: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ayman Mohamed Hussam Al-Din Abd Al-Latif, Ahmed Abdelhamed Hassan, Osama Mohamed Asaad Farahat, Atef Kamel Salama Salem, Karim Hussein Mourad Ghaleb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayman Mohamed Hussam Al-Din Abd Al-LatifAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt, cu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8093-1288
Ahmed Abdelhamed HassanAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt, cu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2545-525X
Osama Mohamed Asaad FarahatAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt, cu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-0795
Atef Kamel Salama SalemAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt, cu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0860-8523
Karim Hussein Mourad GhalebAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt, cu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9142-7561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a current concept in surgery that has excellent short-term outcomes. Currently, no standardized ERAS protocol exists for total hip replacement (THR). So, we conducted this study to assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with dexmedetomidine as an additive in comparison with intrathecal morphine (ITM) for ERAS after THR in Cairo University hospitals. Methods: Our randomized controlled study included 70 patients. The patients were randomly allocated to the M group or E group. M group patients received 5 mL of subcutaneous lidocaine 1% and then 3.5 mL of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with 0.1 mg of morphine in 0.25 mL of normal saline intrathecally. E group patients received ESPB with dexmedetomidine as an additive on the side of surgery and then 3.5 mL of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with 0.25 mL of normal saline intrathecally. The primary outcome was the time of the first successful walking trial for 10 steps with a walker. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain score, total morphine consumption, duration of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and incidence of complications (hypotension, bradycardia, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, and urine retention). Results: The mean time of a successful walking trial with a walker of the E group was 12.69 ± 2.42 h which is decreased significantly in comparison to the M group (19.71 ± 3.11 h), with a mean difference of 7.0 (95% CI 8.81-5.2) hours, with a very large effect size (Cohen Conclusion: ESPB with dexmedetomidine as an additive enhances early mobilization after THR better than ITM with about a 34% decrease in the duration of hospital stay and a lower rate of complications.

Identifiers

PMID42389062
PMCPMC13319897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.