Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389047›Full record

ReviewCognitive neurodynamics2026

An event-related potentials account of brain predictive coding.

Carlos M Gómez, Antonio Arjona, Francisco J Ruíz-Martínez, Manuel Muñoz-Caracuel, Vanesa Muñoz, Elena I Rodriguez-Martinez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlos M GómezHuman Psychobiology Lab, Experimental Psychology Department, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Antonio ArjonaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Francisco J Ruíz-MartínezHuman Psychobiology Lab, Experimental Psychology Department, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Manuel Muñoz-CaracuelDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Andalusian Health Service, Seville, Spain.
Vanesa MuñozHuman Psychobiology Lab, Experimental Psychology Department, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Elena I Rodriguez-MartinezHuman Psychobiology Lab, Experimental Psychology Department, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive coding is a theory that tries to account for how the brain processes in an anticipatory manner the expected stimuli, and reorganizes the underlying neural networks as a consequence of the outcome of predictions: Correct or incorrect. EEG has the advantage of making a continuous and almost instantaneous record of brain activity. The present report summarizes work on Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) and reviews the neural validity of Predictive processing as a mechanism to predict future events, assess the validity of predictions, and then update the probabilities associated with future events. Using two experimental models: predictive tone sequences and central cue Posner paradigms and Bayesian modelling, the report suggests that Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) would be related to prior expectation, Mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 to Bayesian surprise and/or prediction error, and Post Imperative Negative Variation (PINV) to the assessment of trial outcome in uncertainty situations. The review tends to support predictive coding as a theory consistent with brain operations indexed by ERPs.

Indexed as

Brain Bayesian processingContingent negative variationEvent-related potentialsMismatch negativityP300Post-imperative negative variationPredictive codingPredictive processing

Identifiers

PMID42389047
PMCPMC13319546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.