Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388987›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026

Comparison of efficacy of quadratus lumborum block and intrathecal morphine in elective caesarean section for postoperative analgesia - A randomised controlled trial.

D Jeenu, Anand B Medidi, Rahul Pillai, Ekta Rai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D JeenuDepartment of Anaesthesia, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7869-8539
Anand B MedidiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8532-6916
Rahul PillaiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6473-8157
Ekta RaiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-7429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: As caesarean section (C-section) rates continue to rise, effective planning and management of postoperative pain become crucial. Poor control can delay early mobilisation and breastfeeding, and it also raises the risk of complications like thromboembolic events, postoperative ileus, and chronic pain development. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of postoperative analgesia between intrathecal morphine (ITM) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in the elective C-section. Methods: This prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial included 60 women who underwent elective C-sections. The participants were randomly assigned to receive either ITM [0.1 ml (100 μg) of morphine] or bilateral QLB with 40 ml 0.375% ropivacaine. Both the ITM and QLB groups had received a subarachnoid block consisting of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.1 ml of ITM or saline for a total of 2.1 ml. Postoperatively, pain score using the numerical rating scale (NRS), the need for rescue analgesia, and patient satisfaction score (0-10) were monitored for 48 h. Results: Out of the 60 parturients enroled, 59 were included in the final analysis (ITM Conclusion: Group ITM was associated with lower postoperative pain scores, longer-lasting analgesia, reduced need for rescue analgesics, and higher patient satisfaction compared with QLB after elective C-section, with no clinically significant adverse effects.

Indexed as

Analgesiacaesarean sectionintrathecal morphinenerve blockpostoperative painquadratus lumborum

Identifiers

PMID42388987
PMCPMC13322596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.