Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388976›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026

Embryonic scaling: morphogen gradients, size sensing, and scaler genes.

Polina S Timoshina, Andrey G Zaraisky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Polina S TimoshinaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Andrey G ZaraiskyShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic scaling is the ability of developing embryos to preserve proportional patterning despite differences in overall size. This phenomenon has long been recognized in many animal groups and represents a central example of developmental robustness and self-regulation. Its mechanisms are now being clarified through quantitative embryology, theoretical modeling, molecular developmental biology, and mechanobiology. The best-characterized framework for understanding embryonic scaling is morphogen-gradient scaling. In this view, pattern proportions are preserved when morphogen gradients adjust their range and threshold positions according to the size of the embryo or morphogenetic field. Several mechanisms can contribute to this adjustment, including feedback regulation within morphogen networks, size-dependent morphogen production or degradation, ligand transport, and mechanical or geometric constraints. Earlier theoretical studies anticipated the possibility that morphogen-gradient scaling may require size-dependent modulators, that is, regulatory components whose concentration or activity changes with system size. This review considers such size-dependent regulation in the context of the Scalers Hypothesis, which focuses on experimentally identifiable genes and proteins whose expression, concentration, or activity changes systematically with embryo size. Their products can therefore act as molecular links between global geometry and local patterning dynamics. In this way, they may adjust morphogen production, degradation, transport, diffusion range, or threshold interpretation in a size-dependent manner. The review places scaler genes within a broader comparative framework that includes

Indexed as

embryonic patterningmorphogen gradientreaction diffusionscaler genesscalingsea urchinXenopus

Identifiers

PMID42388976
PMCPMC13319035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.