ArticleCureus2026
Effectiveness of Oral Roflumilast Among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients to Prevent Exacerbations.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and severely incapacitating respiratory illness that is characterized by ongoing, non-reversible airflow restrictions. Various medical treatment options include bronchodilators, anti-cholinergic drugs, and steroids. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of oral roflumilast in addition to standard therapy among COPD patients to prevent exacerbations and improve pulmonary function tests (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)). Methodology This quasi-experimental study enrolled 80 moderate-to-severe COPD patients through non-probability sampling. They were divided into two groups. In Group A, participants received standard treatment as per the operational definition for six months. In Group B, participants received once-daily roflumilast, 500 µg, while maintaining background medications of COPD as per the operational definition for six months. Quantitative variables, including age, post-bronchodilator FEV1, and FVC, were expressed as mean ± SD. An independent-sample t-test was used to compare the outcome variables (FEV1 and FVC) between the two groups. The number of COPD exacerbations was analyzed using an appropriate statistical test, such as the Mann-Whitney U test. All the data were analyzed using SPSS version 28.0. Results Both groups showed a significant increment in mean FEV1 and FVC from day zero to six months; however, mean FEV1 and FVC were significantly higher for Group B patients from the fourth to sixth months. A decreasing trend was observed in the frequency of exacerbations in both groups. At the fifth and sixth months of treatment, Group B patients showed significantly lower frequency of exacerbations compared to Group A patients. Conclusions Oral roflumilast as an adjunct to standard COPD therapy improved clinical outcomes by enhancing pulmonary function (particularly FEV1) and reducing exacerbation frequency. Reduction in recurrent exacerbations may contribute to better symptom control, improved quality of life, and decreased healthcare burden. Therefore, roflumilast 500 µg once daily may be considered a useful add-on option in selected COPD patients, although larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted to establish long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.