Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388922›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Giant Masses in a Non-Cirrhotic Liver: All That Look Epithelial Are Not Carcinoma.

Dipanwita Biswas, Suvradeep Mitra, Aravind Sekar, Swapnesh Sahu, Lileswar Kaman

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dipanwita BiswasHistopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Suvradeep MitraHistopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Aravind SekarHistopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Swapnesh SahuGeneral Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Lileswar KamanGeneral Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiomyolipoma (AML) is an uncommon mesenchymal neoplasm with myomelanocytic differentiation. Hepatic AML (HAML) is an uncommon tumor that often mimics a primary hepatic epithelial malignancy and is a challenging diagnosis for clinicians and pathologists. This article discusses the clinical, radiological, histopathological, and immunohistochemical details of two cases of HAML and their differential diagnoses. A 46-year-old woman and a 38-year-old man presented with pain, weakness, and weight loss. Radiology revealed large, well-defined, heterogeneous, enhancing masses in the non-cirrhotic liver. Histopathology showed a variable combination of epithelioid cells, spindle cells, adipocytes, and thick-walled blood vessels with smooth muscle actin (SMA) and HMB45 immunopositivity. The diagnosis of HAML depends on classical histopathology. However, a wide array of differential diagnoses should be considered depending on the proportionate representation of each component. A detailed histological evaluation, judicious use of immunohistochemistry to document myo-melanocytic differentiation, and awareness of the entity are useful for the correct diagnosis.

Indexed as

hepatic angiomyolipomahistopathologyimmunohistochemistryliverpecoma

Identifiers

PMID42388922
PMCPMC13320654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.