ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
Enhancing Care for Critically Ill Patients Boarding in the Emergency Department: A 360° Evaluation of an Emergency Medicine Critical Care Fellow Model.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Evaluate the impact of an emergency medicine-trained anesthesiology critical care (EM ACC) fellow on the delivery of critical care to patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and boarding in the emergency department (ED). Methods: This is a mixed methods observational study at a single urban tertiary care center. A second year EM ACC fellow was deployed to the ED for 2 months. We performed a 360° analysis of this pilot program using a cross-sectional staff survey, an analysis of fellow productivity, and a secondary retrospective cohort analysis of patient outcomes. Results: Fellows worked a total of 26 shifts and encountered 101 ICU boarding patients. Surveys were completed by 71 medical professionals: 22 emergency medicine (EM) physicians, 44 EM nurses, and 5 critical care (CC) physicians (n = 107, response rate 66.4%). On a 5-point Likert scale, the EM ACC fellow was reported to be invaluable or very helpful by 91.5% of all respondents. Qualitative analysis of open feedback emphasized improved team communication, coordination of care, timely interventions, and enhanced CC education. Fellows generated 3.1 work relative value unit (wRVU) per hour and 4.9 wRVU per patient while facilitating 11 (10.8%) ICU downgrades and 4 (3.9%) ICU upgrades. There were no significant differences in patient outcomes (ICU length of stay [LOS], hospital LOS, and discharge disposition). Conclusion: This model, using an EM ACC fellow, offers an approach to improve the delivery of CC to ICU patients boarding in the ED and may be modified to fit the resources, needs, and models available at different institutions. At the study institution, integrating EM ACC fellows into the ED garnered widespread support and demonstrated billing feasibility, but did not show difference in patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.