Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388861›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Selective vagus-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis guided by intraoperative neuromonitoring: evidence of lateral motor fiber clustering in the vagus nerve.

Jiedong Kou, Daqi Zhang, Le Zhou, Shijie Li, Tie Wang, Peiyao Wang, Zihan Zhao, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Carla Colombo, Yishen Zhao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiedong KouDivision of Thyroid Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Thyroid Disease, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Daqi ZhangDivision of Thyroid Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Thyroid Disease, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Le ZhouDivision of Thyroid Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Thyroid Disease, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Shijie LiDivision of Thyroid Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Thyroid Disease, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Tie WangDivision of Thyroid Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Thyroid Disease, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Peiyao WangDivision of Thyroid Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Thyroid Disease, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Zihan ZhaoDivision of Thyroid Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Thyroid Disease, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Gianlorenzo DionigiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Carla ColomboDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Yishen ZhaoDivision of Thyroid Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Thyroid Disease, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Hui SunDivision of Thyroid Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Thyroid Disease, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Direct anastomosis (DA) is the standard approach after recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) transection but is often not feasible due to excessive tension. This experimental study evaluated a novel intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM)-guided selective vagus-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis (SVRA) technique and compared its immediate electrophysiologic performance with DA in a porcine thyroid surgery model. Methods: 18 transected nerves from 9 pigs were randomized to DA or SVRA (9 nerves per group). In the SVRA group, low-current IONM was used to map vagus nerve (VN) motor fibers innervating laryngeal musculature; these fibers were selectively dissected and anastomosed to the transected RLN. In the DA group, end-to-end RLN neurorrhaphy was performed under microscopy. Electromyography (EMG) amplitudes and latencies were recorded at baseline and serially up to 2 hours after anastomosis; hemodynamic parameters were monitored to assess the safety of VN manipulation. Results: VN motor fibers innervating the laryngeal muscles were predominantly localized to the lateral VN and were mostly concentrated in a single strand. After anastomosis, both techniques yielded early EMG recovery, with post-anastomotic amplitudes often exceeding 50% of baseline. A cross-innervation model (left VN to right RLN) produced immediate EMG responses approaching baseline and bilateral vocal fold activation. Moreover, when the anastomosed nerve was pulled, the EMG amplitude varied with the alteration of the relative position of the fiber components at the two severed ends. VN dissection did not cause clinically relevant changes in blood pressure or oxygen saturation, and only minor, non-significant heart rate increases were observed. Conclusion: IONM-guided SVRA enables selective recruitment of VN motor fibers for targeted RLN reconstruction while largely preserving VN trunk integrity. These findings support SVRA as a physiologically grounded and technically feasible reconstructive option that can achieve acute electrophysiological recovery when tension precludes DA during thyroid surgery-related RLN transection, although long-term functional reinnervation remains to be established.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMotor NeuronsRecurrent Laryngeal NerveRecurrent Laryngeal Nerve InjuriesVagus NerveAnimalsElectromyographyFemaleSwineThyroidectomyintraoperative neuromonitoringnerve regeneration and functional recoveryrecurrent laryngeal nerve injuryselective vagus–recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosisthyroid surgery

Identifiers

PMID42388861
PMCPMC13318641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.