ReviewBioscience of microbiota, food and health2026
Microbiogeographic insights as keys to understanding personalized gut microbiota responses: the role of
Review in Bioscience of microbiota, food and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is growing optimism regarding the potential therapeutic and preventive benefits of regulating intestinal microbiota for various diseases. Diet is one of the most straightforward and safest methods for modulating the intestinal microbiota; however, considerable individual differences have been observed in the microbiota response to dietary interventions. These individual differences pose substantial challenges in application, which are primarily attributed to variations in the commensal flora and bacterial competition for nutrients. Our previous research indicated that the microscopic localization of bacteria provides valuable insights into the mechanisms by which specific intestinal bacterial species acquire nutrients within a competitive gut environment. Furthermore, our analysis revealed that the combination of bifidobacterial species and the nutrient source found in the localization analysis determined individual differences in microbiota response. These findings suggest that bacterial colonization facilitates the efficient, preferential, and presumably exclusive utilization of solid nutrient sources in the human gut. Moreover, the impact of a single nutrient source on the gut and human body may vary depending on the presence or absence of the primary species colonizing that source. In this review, we examined the micrometer-scale localization of intestinal bacteria and individual variability in microbiota responses to diet, drawing upon the results of our previous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.