Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388837›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

Invasive mosquitoes in the non-endemic German region of Saarland: What does the public know and how does it respond?

Kamran Dousti, Jakob Kolleck, Irena Harsch, Michael Altmoos, Ina Steinert, Mark Alexander Eichelmann, Phillipp Jung, Sören L Becker, Sophie Schneitler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kamran DoustiInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Jakob KolleckZoo Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Irena HarschMinistry of Labour, Social Affairs, Women and Health, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Michael AltmoosMinistry of the Environment, Climate, Mobility, Agriculture and Consumer Protection, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Ina SteinertNeunkirchen Zoo, Neunkirchen, Germany.
Mark Alexander EichelmannNeunkirchen Zoo, Neunkirchen, Germany.
Phillipp JungInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Sören L BeckerInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Sophie SchneitlerInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By assessing public awareness, preventive behavior, and knowledge regarding invasive mosquito species in Saarland, Germany, a non-endemic region at increasing invasion risk, this study aimed to explore how the introduction of invasive mosquitoes can be addressed in non-endemic areas. A population-based anonymous questionnaire in Saarland was conducted from February to June 2024. Participants were recruited through broad public dissemination using digital and analog approaches. Nine items assessed mosquito protection practices, knowledge of invasive species, and potential for pathogen transmission. Among 1064 respondents, 623 (58.6%) met the inclusion criteria. While over half of them recognized stagnant water removal as an effective preventive measure, fewer than one fifth practiced it regularly. Travel medicine consultations were associated with greater use of protective clothing. Among participants aged 26-35, men were more likely than women to report no prior engagement with mosquito prevention measures. Although most participants had heard of

Indexed as

Aedes albopictusInvasive mosquitoesPreventive behaviorPublic knowledgeVector surveillance

Identifiers

PMID42388837
PMCPMC13320451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.