ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Remote realities: In-depth conversations on antimicrobial stewardship in remote Indigenous communities using a One Health approach.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A One Health approach encourages transdisciplinarity and equity when working to optimise the health of people, animals and the environment. It is helpful to use a One Health approach to explore issues such as antimicrobial resistance (AMR), where a traditionally medicalised focus may otherwise prevent investigation or understanding of lesser known but still relevant influences. In-depth interviews with fourteen participants (nurses, doctors, Aboriginal health workers, veterinarians and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) pharmacists) were conducted to explore under-investigated topics of AMR and AMS in remote communities as they relate to medical and veterinary practice. We aimed to explore the relationships between factors influencing antimicrobial use and health systems, such as the social determinants of health. Staff shortages and high workload were identified as factors that influenced AMS and the capacity of prescribers to make more appropriate antimicrobial choices. Generally low antimicrobial use in remote community veterinary practice was identified, however veterinary surgical prophylaxis is an area where the quality of prescribing could be improved. Other enablers for AMS include the positive influence of local Aboriginal health practitioners and their equivalents in animal health, openness by participants to improve their practices, and evidence amongst participants of understanding or acknowledgement of upstream drivers of AMR and interest in working collaboratively across disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.