ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Optimizing Hepatitis C Virus Antibody Testing Strategy and Setting: Results From a Large Real-World Screening Program.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optimal hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening is required to prevent transmission and progression to advanced liver disease and to meet global elimination targets. While administrative health data can highlight trends in testing and treatment, additional information is required to understand barriers in the care cascade. We conducted a real-world analysis documenting the care cascade and the effectiveness of HCV antibody (Ab) screening modalities across different community and clinical settings. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of individuals who completed HCV Ab testing at participating centers in Ontario, Canada, between May 2010 and June 2023. Results: Among 61 605 individuals tested, the prevalence of HCV Ab was 13.6% and highest among individuals aged 35-44 years (23.2%) and individuals tested at addiction clinics (41.0%). Among those with an HCV Ab-positive result, 79.7% ever completed RNA testing of whom 57.3% were RNA positive. Among those with an RNA-positive result, 65.0% attended a follow-up appointment. Among those who attended their appointment, 94.0% initiated treatment (61.1% of the RNA-positive), 77.4% of those who started had documented treatment completion (47.3% of the RNA-positive), and 59.6% of those who completed treatment had documented sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (28.2% of the RNA-positive). The Ab testing modality was closely related to test setting, and primary care was the most effective at linkage to care. Conclusions: While there was some attrition from HCV Ab positivity to RNA testing, treatment initiation was higher compared with administrative data. These results highlight the benefits of multiple testing modalities and matching the optimal Ab testing modality to the setting, with strong pathways for linkage to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.