ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Evaluation of potential serum biomarkers for individuals at risk of multiple sclerosis.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating proteins have been widely investigated as potential biomarkers in multiple sclerosis (MS), yet findings across studies are often inconsistent, likely reflecting differences in disease stage, treatment exposure, and cohort composition. Studying individuals at elevated risk of MS prior to disease onset offers a unique opportunity to identify immune alterations that precede clinical disease while minimizing confounders. Here, we investigated whether alterations in six previously MS-associated biomarkers are detectable and associate to underlying genetic susceptibility in two independent sample collections comprising people with MS (pwMS), healthy controls, and asymptomatic first-degree relatives of pwMS from the Genes & Environment in MS (GEMS) study cohort. The panel, representing complementary axes of MS immunopathology, included granzyme A (GZMA), MER tyrosine kinase (MERTK), interleukin-2 receptor alpha (IL2RA), osteopontin (SPP1), CD30 (TNFRSF8), and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1). None of the proteins demonstrated associations with MS. A composite score constructed from externally derived effect estimates was not associated with MS status in either collection or in meta-analysis. Among asymptomatic first-degree relatives, the composite score was not significantly associated with group status. In contrast, an inverse correlation between SPP1 and the MS genetic risk score among GEMS participants was found (β = -0.246, p = 0.001). Together, these findings suggest that several circulating proteins recently proposed as MS biomarkers are not robust tools to distinguish MS from healthy individuals. However, SPP1 levels are highlighted for further evaluation among at-risk individuals, and further work is needed to determine whether circulating immune signatures can capture the earliest stages of MS in at-risk individuals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.