ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Mental health status of workers in the semiconductor industry during the COVID-19 pandemic: comparisons between regions on three continents.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had detrimental effects on mental health globally, both in and outside the work context. The type of work and work organization additionally had adverse or protective effects on mental health, with sometimes inconsistent findings, like a dualistic effect of working from home. Country differences in mental health effects of the pandemic have been reported, but comparative studies in the work context face the challenge of different work types and different experimental designs. Thus, the present investigation compares connections regarding mental-health status, COVID-19 related experiences and management satisfaction at the workplace with an identical questionnaire design in the same sector between three continents. Material and methods: 1,946 workers from three continents in the semiconductor industry were investigated using validated mental health questionnaires. Additionally, COVID-19-related experiences, organizational factors and satisfaction with SARS-CoV-19 management at the workplace were assessed. Results: Significant differences between continents could be found regarding mental health parameters, with higher anxiety and lower self-efficacy, but also higher well-being in the Asian group. Significant continent differences could further be found regarding personal experiences with COVID-19, estimated danger and subjective protection against an infection. Working from home was related to most of the assessed mental health parameters in a beneficial way, while at the same time being negatively related to work satisfaction. Conclusion: Continent-specific differences in pandemic mental health effects should be considered in research, but also in the planning of counseling offers. Working from home might show beneficial mental health effects when implemented correctly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.