Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388748›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2026

Advancing health equity in proactive health management: from data underrepresentation and algorithmic bias to a closed-loop governance framework.

Qiming Zhao, Wenhui Jiang, Chen Zhang, Minglian Ouyang, Nan Wu, You Guo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiming ZhaoMedical Big Data and Bioinformatics Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Wenhui JiangMedical Big Data and Bioinformatics Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Chen ZhangMedical Big Data and Bioinformatics Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Minglian OuyangFirst School of Clinical Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Nan WuFirst School of Clinical Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
You GuoMedical Big Data and Bioinformatics Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proactive health management (PHM) relies on wearable devices, mobile health applications, and artificial intelligence (AI) to continuously monitor the health status of individuals, thus supporting risk stratification and early intervention. The effectiveness of such techniques fundamentally depends on whether training data adequately represents the target population. Structural data gaps in patient-generated health data (PGHD), driven by social determinants of health (SDoH) and the digital divide, result in the systematic underrepresentation of high-risk groups in training data. This underrepresentation cascades through model development and deployment, leading to prediction bias, risk omission in vulnerable populations, and misallocation of health resources. To synthesize current evidence on this topic, we conducted a narrative review searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for peer-reviewed literature published between January 2015 and February 2026, using terms related to proactive health management, artificial intelligence, algorithmic bias, and health equity. A total of 108 studies meeting predefined inclusion criteria were included and synthesized thematically. This review analyzes the mechanisms driving insufficient data representativeness in PHM and traces how prediction bias accumulates across model development and deployment, resulting in health inequities. We identify that equity risk in PHM stems from the interplay of three factors: social inequality structures, data collection mechanisms, and predictive target design. Because these drivers operate across the entire PHM lifecycle, addressing equity requires integrated, system-wide governance rather than isolated technical adjustments. This paper therefore proposes a comprehensive closed-loop governance framework encompassing targeted data collection, fairness constraint mechanisms, pre-deployment subgroup audits, and post-deployment continuous monitoring. By transforming fairness from a technical condition into a core systemic principle, this framework aims to ensure health equity throughout the PHM lifecycle.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHealth EquityBiasDigital HealthHumansSocial Determinants of Healthalgorithmic biasartificial intelligencehealth equitypatient-generated health dataproactive health managementsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID42388748
PMCPMC13318946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.