ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Prioritizing embryologist health: occupational health hazards and preventive strategies.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical embryologists are pivotal to assisted reproductive technology (ART) success, performing critical procedures from gamete manipulation to embryo transfer, yet they face multifaceted and under recognized occupational health challenges in a high-stakes environment. This review examines a variety of occupational risks and diseases affecting embryologists, synthesizing literature on physical, psychological, and ergonomic hazards. Musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent, with shoulder pain increasing in a dose-dependent manner as career length progresses. Psychological morbidity is similarly significant, as a subset of embryologists have stress-related mental health issues and elevated rates of emotional exhaustion. Furthermore, gaps in safety compliance persist, including insufficient protection during the handling of semen or liquid nitrogen. This review ultimately offers two concrete contributions: (1) reframing embryologist health as a quality assurance imperative rather than solely a personnel issue, and (2) leveraging automation and digital technology as a targeted strategy to reduce ergonomic and psychological hazards. Building on this framework, this review also proposes a multi-level intervention strategy encompassing individual, ergonomic, organizational, and technological dimensions to alleviate the aforementioned risks, directly linking embryologist well-being to treatment safety and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.