Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388712›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

The difference in scotopic and photopic pupil responses: a potential indicator for long-term glycemic management.

Ye Li, Zeyu Pan, Qi Ren, Fan Shi, Pengxia Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ye Li *Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zeyu Pan *Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qi RenDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Fan ShiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Pengxia WanDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic autonomic neuropathy manifests in pupillary dynamics, often serving as a subtle precursor to systemic complications. Therefore, quantitative biomarkers that can effectively index disease chronicity and autonomic status-independent of glycemic control-are required for precise monitoring. Hence, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of the pupil diameter (PD) difference under varying lighting conditions in a cohort of diabetic patients and non-diabetic controls. We employed high-resolution pupillometry to quantify pupillary responsiveness and assessed the association between PD difference, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and disease duration. We observed a significant attenuation in the PD difference in the diabetic group (0.94 ± 0.44) compared to controls (1.21 ± 0.48), with high statistical significance. Data from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis suggested that PD difference meets the performance criteria for identifying established disease duration (>1 year), indicating that quantitative pupillometry provides a viable clinical endpoint for assessing the chronicity of diabetes and its associated autonomic neuropathy.

Indexed as

autonomic neuropathydiabetes mellitusglycated hemoglobinneurophysiologypupil diameterpupillometry

Identifiers

PMID42388712
PMCPMC13321149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.