Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388661›Full record

ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2026

Clinical and radiological results of custom-made glenoid implants in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a mean follow-up of 36 months.

Martin Petermann, Puneet Monga, Géza Pap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin PetermannSchwerpunktpraxis f. Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Puneet MongaWrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, UK.
Géza PapHELIOS Park-Klinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Custom-made glenoid implants (CMGIs) represent a new technology for treating severe glenoid bone deficiencies. Despite the potential advantages of achieving sufficient primary stability and precise implant positioning, its role is not clear due to the scarcity of clinical studies. Methods: The first 12 consecutive patients who were treated with CMGIs (ProMade, Enovis) at a single institution were enrolled. At a minimum follow-up (FU) of 2 years (range: 24-76 months; mean 36 months), the clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test, and range of motion and compared with pre-operative values. Radiographs were assessed for inferior notching, osteolysis, or other signs of loosening. All complications were recorded. Results: There was a significant improvement in Constant score (26 to 71 [ Conclusion: CMGIs are an option for the treatment of severe glenoid bone deficiencies at a short- to medium-term follow-up with promising clinical results and no adverse radiological signs. The complication rate is not insignificant, and further studies with longer-term follow-up are suggested.

Indexed as

3-dimensional-printingArthroplastyCustomGlenoid bone lossPatient-specificShoulder

Identifiers

PMID42388661
PMCPMC13320035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.