Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388657›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2026

Advancing sensory metrology: establishing a standardized protocol for measuring the concentration-dependent sweetness potency of sweeteners utilizing gLMS.

Runrou Wong, Seo-Jin Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Runrou WongDepartment of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea.
Seo-Jin ChungDepartment of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify an optimal sensory evaluation protocol for accurately modeling concentration-response (C-R) curves of sweeteners using the generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). Four protocol configurations were compared, focusing on three variables: serving methodology (traditional [T-method] vs. sucrose-sweetener combined [SSC method]), sample presentation order (ascending vs. Williams Latin square), and scaling technique (15-point rating scale [15PRS] vs. gLMS). The gLMS proved highly robust for quantifying sweetness intensity and modeling C-R curves. Protocols employing the gLMS delivered more accurate sweetness potency measurements and exhibited significantly higher resistance to contextual bias compared to the 15PRS. The 15PRS consistently overestimated sweetness potency at low concentrations, especially for high-intensity sweeteners. Although the SSC method has previously mitigated contextual effects in category scales, it offered little significant improvement in accuracy when used with the gLMS. Additionally, serving order did not affect gLMS-derived potency measurements, showing the scale's stability. Overall, the gLMS is inherently less susceptible to contextual effects in sensory evaluation, making it a reliable alternative to traditional category scales for standardized sweetness metrology.

Indexed as

Concentration–response curvesContextual biasGeneral labeled magnitude scaleSweetenerSweetness potency

Identifiers

PMID42388657
PMCPMC13321376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.