ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Enhanced differentiation of breast lesions through integration of microvascular flow imaging and machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer diagnosis relies on imaging, yet conventional Doppler ultrasound possesses limitations in visualizing tumor microvasculature. This study aimed to compare Microvascular Flow imaging (MV-Flow) with Color Doppler Flow Imaging (CDFI) and evaluate a machine learning (ML) framework integrating MV-Flow parameters for differentiating breast lesions. Methods: In this prospective study, 101 breast lesions from 79 patients underwent grayscale ultrasound, CDFI, and MV-Flow. Adler grading and the quantitative Vascular Index (VI) were obtained. Based on six features (age, size, CDFI/MV-Flow Adler grades, VI, BI-RADS), eight ML models were trained (80% data) and tested (20% data). Model performance was evaluated, and SHAP analysis identified key predictors. Results: MV-Flow demonstrated superior sensitivity, detecting blood flow in 16 lesions missed by CDFI, and showed significantly higher inter-observer agreement (weighted Kappa=0.68 vs. 0.51 for CDFI). The median Vascular Index (VI) was markedly higher in malignant lesions (20.25) compared to benign ones (3.10, P<0.001). The diagnostic AUC for MV-Flow Adler grade, VI alone, and their combination were 0.874, 0.823, and 0.888, respectively. Among eight machine learning models trained on six clinical and sonographic features, the K-Nearest Neighbors model achieved the best performance on the independent test set with an accuracy of 0.927 and an F1-score of 0.947. SHAP analysis identified BI-RADS category and patient age as the most important predictive features in the model. Conclusion: MV-Flow outperforms CDFI in depicting breast tumor microvasculature. ML models integrating MV-Flow parameters can optimize diagnostic accuracy, offering an objective tool for clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.