ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Reduction in Operative Time After Implementation of Computer-Assisted Navigation in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty With Consideration of Learning Curve.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with improved component positioning accuracy. However, its impact on operative efficiency remains uncertain and may be influenced by the learning curve during adoption. This study evaluates the effect of a computerized hip navigation system on operative time and surgical complications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 300 consecutive direct anterior THAs by a single surgeon: 150 using conventional overlay, followed by 150 after implementation of CAN. After applying exclusion criteria, 292 cases remained. Demographic and perioperative variables were collected. Generalized linear modeling adjusted for covariates (body mass index, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class) to assess relationship between surgical technique and operative time. Postoperative complications were compared between groups. Results: CAN was associated with significant reduction in operative time. Compared to conventional THA (covariate-adjusted mean: 47.63 minutes), operative time was 2.65 minutes shorter during the learning phase, identified via statistical analysis as the first 100 CAN cases. Post-learning phase, mean operative time further decreased to 40.42 minutes, 7.21 minutes less than conventional THA ( Conclusions: Implementation of CAN was associated with significantly decreased operative time after a brief learning curve, without an increase in complications. Findings support safe adoption of CAN in direct anterior THA and suggest enhanced operative efficiency, aligning with the demands of value-based care and increasing surgical volumes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.